North Carolina Higher education system

Margaret Spellings's Vision for Higher Education

In the week between the revelation that the University of North Carolina’s Board of Governors was looking at former Education Secretary Margaret Spellings to lead the 16-campus system and her ultimate selection last Friday, most of the reporting and commentary focused on whether the board and the presidential search committee were following procedures.

Now that she has been selected to run one of the country’s best-respected public university systems, however, we need to understand her vision for the future of American higher education. As secretary, Margaret Spellings put together one of the most high-profile commissions on higher education in American history. In 2006, the commission issued the Spellings Report, or as it is formally known, “A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education.”

That document sought to transform the purpose and structure of American higher education to, in the report’s words, ensure “future economic growth.”


At the heart of the report is the desire to transform universities so that they serve solely the needs of the market. Students need credentials and skills to get ahead and employers want programs and research that meet their needs. Thus, the report seeks a higher education system “that creates new knowledge, contributes to economic prosperity and global competitiveness, and empowers citizens.”

It becomes clear, however, that only the central phrase matters. There is nothing in the report that recognizes the need for basic noncommercial research in the arts and sciences, or that states why intellectual inquiry is good on its own terms. And citizenship barely registers in the rest of the document.

The commission's report completely ignores the American tradition of liberal general education. In fact, the phrases “liberal education” and “liberal arts” do not even appear in the document. Citizens, then, need to be empowered to get ahead, but not to be part of a democratic polity.

While the report seeks to promote “social mobility, ” it does not seek to offer more students access to the knowledge offered by a college education but to develop what the report calls “intellectual capital.” This is made clear by what the report states to be the “value of higher education” - to feed the “new knowledge-driven economy.”

In fact, the civic and other benefits of higher education are presented as a byproduct and not a purpose of higher education. In the section “Findings Regarding the Value of Higher Education, ” at the end of a long list concerning “the transformation of the world economy” and the relationship between degrees and salaries, the report acknowledges as an afterthought that higher education “produces broader social gains.” Yet the report clearly places the civic and cultural purposes of higher education as secondary to the economic: “Colleges and universities are major economic engines, while also serving as civic and cultural centers.”

In the section entitled “Findings Regarding Learning, ” the meaning of citizenship is linked to people “who are able to lead and compete in the 21st-century global marketplace, ” not who care and think deeply about the public welfare because they have received a serious general education in the arts and sciences. According to the report, the purpose of learning is not to gain wisdom, ethics or insight, but to develop intellectual capital, or, stated more clearly, to reduce one’s mind into a profit-generating entity that improves one’s own salary while serving the needs of American business.


The Spellings Report recognizes that higher education exists in a “consumer-driven environment, ” but rather than resist the commodification of education, the report instead uses this as context to argue that student consumers care little about “whether a college has for-profit or nonprofit status” and whether classes are online or in buildings. But students are not consumers but students, and institutions of learning have the responsibility to educate those who do not yet know what they are seeking nor what they need. To treat education as just another market good is to mistake its very nature.

Because the commissioners expected resistance from traditional higher education institutions, the report embraces all the buzzwords that have come to be associated with the idea of disruptive innovation. Its authors presume that higher education is a “mature enterprise.” “History is littered with examples of industries that, at their peril, ” did not respond to a changing society, the report warns. New technology and global competition mandate a fundamental transformation of education institutions. Given the growing cost of tuition and that “the prospects for a return to a time of generous state subsidies are not good, ” the report urges “a focused program of cost cutting and productivity improvements.”

The question, then, is how these cuts and productivity gains will be achieved. While the report does not explicitly advocate doing away with expensive things like faculty members with tenure and academic freedom and campuses with classrooms in which students interact with teachers, these goals are hinted at. The report explicitly embraces “new providers and new paradigms, from for-profit universities to distance learning.” It urges states to promote “both traditional and electronic delivery of college courses in high school.”

The report aspires to see “the dissemination of technological advances in teaching that lower costs on a quality-adjusted basis.” It urges the elimination of “regulatory and accreditation barriers to new models in higher education that will increase supply and drive costs down.” That final phrase refers to institutions like Western Governors University, which, as I have argued elsewhere, eliminates the traditional role of faculty members, offers no meaningful liberal education and outsources curricular design. (Western Governors’ president, Robert Mendenhall, was one of the report's commissioners.)

which business is an example of a multinational corporation how start up a business how many teaching positions are open in texas the man company best products where to find system preferences on mac whose project is the metro manila subway when product patent started in india teaching where it matters which entrepreneur is not intended in innovative how teaching and learning relate to obe where i'm from locations which london pass is best how much project manager earn in canada who solution definition how much manager in axie how science is unlocking the secrets of addiction where does development occur how many entrepreneurs how much start up loan can i get how much start up money small business how much london visa cost startup where is izzy why manager is appointed how often set up guitar is 1 8 miles far how many system calls are there in linux which solutions are isotonic how many technology standard e commerce has solutions how college where to print business cards how many startups make it where to study entrepreneurship where does development occur which product roadmap where's device management on iphone whom may concern how much developer to bleach which solution is the positive control when product owner is not available why startup fail what are the 5 levels of management how much london tube cost how london bridge fell how much science diet to feed my dog when startup valuation
You might also like:
North Carolina Hip Replacement System Lawyer (DePuy
North Carolina Hip Replacement System Lawyer (DePuy ...
Summit on North Carolina Education
Summit on North Carolina Education
North Carolina Foundations of Reading Test Flashcard Study System: Practice Questions & Exam Review for the North Carolina Foundations of Reading Test (Cards)
Book (Mometrix Media LLC)
We are the University of North Carolina Health Care System
We are the University of North Carolina Health Care System
Impact of Using SAS: North Carolina Community College System
Impact of Using SAS: North Carolina Community College System
Related Posts